Integration partnership agreement
SaaS Partnership Agreement: The Six Clauses That Matter
The clauses that decide whether an integration survives its first outage — scope, split, support, exit — and why most integration deals never get one.
An integration partnership agreement is the document that turns "we should integrate" into something both sides can rely on. At minimum it defines what each party ships, which revenue is in scope for the split, the percentage and duration, who answers the customer when the integration fails, how each side may use the other's data, and what happens on exit. Most integrations never get one — the deal lives in a Slack thread — which is precisely why they collapse the first time an outage needs an owner. Ordana generates the agreement from the collaboration's own terms and collects identity-verified signatures from every party. It is not legal advice, and for anything unusual you should have your own counsel read it.
Who it's for
- Two founders who have agreed to integrate and don't want to pay a lawyer to start
- Anyone whose partnership currently exists as a chat thread and a launch date
- Teams that need the support and outage questions settled before code ships
- Partners who want a defined exit rather than an awkward conversation later
Why it works
- Support ownership decided in advance turns an outage into a process instead of an argument
- A named revenue scope stops the split from being renegotiated every quarter
- Identity-verified signatures mean you know who actually signed
- A defined term and exit make the deal easy to say yes to, because it is easy to leave
How Ordana powers it
- The agreement is generated from the collaboration's own plan and revenue-share rules, so the document and the system agree
- Signatures are identity-verified and the executed PDF is archived for both sides
- Disputes route through a defined process written into the agreement rather than being improvised
- Governance built in: a collaboration can be paused, and deletion is conditional rather than instant, so records survive a falling-out
How integration partnerships usually run vs. Ordana
The technical half is the same either way. The difference is whether anyone is paid for it.
| Feature | The usual way | Ordana |
|---|---|---|
| What exists | A chat thread and a launch date | A signed agreement generated from the actual terms |
| Revenue scope | Unstated, so it gets argued later | Named Stripe products or prices, fixed at signing |
| Support ownership | Decided during the first outage | Assigned in the plan, with a committed response time |
| Signatures | A thumbs-up emoji | Identity-verified signature per party, archived as a PDF |
| Exit | An awkward conversation | A defined term, and a capability that simply stops answering |
Frequently asked questions
What should an integration partnership agreement include?
Six things at minimum: what each party ships and by when; which revenue is in scope for the split; the percentage, duration and any cap; who takes first-line support and how fast they respond; how each side may use data the integration passes; and what happens on termination. Everything else is negotiable — these six are what fail in practice when they are missing.
Do I need a lawyer for this?
Ordana generates the agreement and collects identity-verified signatures, which is enough for most straightforward revenue-share integrations between two small companies. It is not legal advice. If the deal involves exclusivity, regulated data, an unusual jurisdiction, or numbers large enough to matter to your cap table, have your own counsel read it before signing.
Who is responsible when the integration breaks?
Whoever's product the user is looking at takes the first-line support — it is your interface and your customer, and they should not have to work out whose fault it is. The partner owns the thing underneath and commits to a response time in the plan, so an outage has an owner and a clock before anything goes live.
How do we get out of it?
The agreement carries a term, so it ends on a date unless both sides continue it. Practically, an integration is easy to unwind by construction: a capability stops answering when the partner stops serving it, a handoff stops provisioning, and a placement leaves nothing behind. A deal that is easy to leave is much easier to enter.
Is the agreement enforceable across countries?
Ordana derives the governing law from the parties involved and writes a dispute-resolution process into the agreement rather than leaving it to be improvised. Cross-border enforcement is always harder than same-country enforcement, which is one more reason the automated settlement matters: the money moves as agreed without anyone having to enforce anything.
Related reading
Playbook
What to Put in an Integration Partnership Agreement
The five things to agree in writing before an integration breaks: who owns support when the partner's side goes down, notice for breaking changes, how revenue is attributed and reported, a clean exit, and what data crosses.
Essay
Integration Partners Get Paid Nothing — And That's Why Integrations Rot
Referral partners get 10-20% of first-year revenue. Resellers get 20-40% of ongoing revenue. Integration partners — the ones who did the most durable work — usually get a launch post. Then the integration quietly stops working, and nobody is paid to notice.
Playbook
How to Set Up a Revenue-Share Collaboration in 15 Minutes (and Why the Right Partner Changes Everything)
The old playbook: do everything yourself until you've saved up enough cash to buy what you need. The faster one: find a startup that already has it, set up a revenue-share collaboration in 15 minutes, and profit together. Here's why the right partner changes everything — and how Ordana removes the time-cost and risk that normally kill these deals.
Find the products next door
Free to join. Ordana matches the partners, drafts the integration plan, produces the contract and splits the revenue automatically. You write the integration.
Get started free